If Tariff Anger Coalesces and Focuses, It Could Re-Set the Political Chessboard. More Apprehensive than Excited.

Back to blogging.  Helps me organize my thoughts.  Your replies and comments always welcome.

97% of strollers and 87% of car seats are made in China.  Not optional purchases.  Prices are already up 30% reportedly.  What if they go fully out of stock?

TLDR:  We are in the early phases of a potentially epic self-sabotage.  It likely grinds on for months or into 2026.  That could – maybe? – drive a US political re-alignment.  Likely more populism, so I’m not getting out the pom poms…

The self-induced trade heart-attack is going to hit store shelves soon – random and cascading shortages + price increases.  I have no idea how big or bad the impact will be.  I’ve seen no good, objective analysis.  That is worrying in itself.  My guess is no-one really knows – like COVID.  What we do know is…  The longer supply chain paralysis lasts…

  1. …the collateral damage reverberates in self-reinforcing waves.
  2. …subsequent repair (after an inevitable climb-down) will take exponentially longer.

Pain for months or maybe years will translate to anger.  That anger will foster a sense of collective grievance among a broad and otherwise diverse slice of the US population.

Collective grievance can lead to collective identity and action.  SPECULATION STARTS HERE:  People might coalesce a new collective “us vs them” narrative – potentially re-drawing tribal boundaries and the political chess board.  Might not actually happen.  Worth thinking about regardless…

Us-Vs-Them

  • We know those that will be “them” =>  People in power.  They broke it loudly and proudly.  They’ll own it.  Although the other “elites” could end up damned alongside them.  Collective grievance paints with a broad brush…
  • The shape of “us” is harder to guess at.  Who unites with whom around a collective dislike of “them?”  Catalytic moments aren’t predictable.  Nor are the post-catalyst coalitions.

Without know the nature of “us,” we can’t really guess about who (if anyone) might turn that new narrative into a political opportunity and movement.  If talented, he/she might end up elected with a “change” mandate and the inclination to follow through.

We can guess he/she will likely be a populist.  That “change” administration might get the trains rolling again – like Mussolini did (and unlike Trump).  But a more tactically competent, cynical crew might pick up the authoritarian project where Trump’s yahoos leave it.

If we get a more competent, cynical populist, Right or Left won’t matter so much as “can we save our Democracy?”  We live in interesting times… Not very happy about it just right now.

Share
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.